Janice Dickinson Before Cosmetic Facial Procedures: A Rare Look at Her Early Supermodel Days
Janice Dickinson has revealed the results of another facelift, sparking strong reactions from fans who said the 71-year-old supermodel looks dramatically different. Beverly Hills plastic surgeon Dr. Harrison Lee shared before-and-after photos on Instagram showing Dickinson three months after a “major facial rejuvenation” procedure. According to Dr. Lee, the treatment included an endoscopic brow and midface lift, deep plane facelift, dual plane neck lift, subnasal lip lift, extensive fat transfer and full-face CO2 laser resurfacing. He said the images were taken without makeup in the post-op shots and without any filters or editing. Dickinson responded approvingly, writing, “I f-cking love it.”
The post drew mostly positive comments, with many followers saying she looked refreshed and younger. Some said the results brought back memories of her earlier modeling years, before her history of cosmetic procedures. Dickinson has long spoken openly about plastic surgery and first said she went under the knife at age 32, when she was dating Sylvester Stallone. In a June 2024 appearance on the “Off the Vine” podcast, she said she had a mini facelift because she noticed jowls beginning to form. She has also previously discussed other procedures, including facelifts, a tummy tuck, collagen implants and Botox. In 2014, she appeared on E!’s “Botched” to replace breast implants that were about 30 years old.
Dickinson’s latest cosmetic update comes after a serious injury she says she suffered in 2022 while filming “I’m a Celebrity … Get Me Out of Here!” in South Africa. In September 2025, she filed a lawsuit in the United Kingdom against ITV Studios, alleging the incident caused permanent facial deformities and nerve damage that affected her ability to speak, eat and drink. The lawsuit claims she sustained traumatic scarring across several areas of her face, including her lips, mouth, cheeks, chin and lower face. Dickinson is seeking £700,000 in compensation, accusing the broadcaster of failing in its duty of care.
