Candace Owens has escalated her criticism of Laura Loomer by questioning whether Loomer is truly serving Donald Trump’s interests. In a pointed remark, Owens told Loomer that she may believe she is helping the president and that he values her support, but argued that “you are not and he does not.” The exchange reflects growing tension among prominent conservative voices as Trump continues to distance himself from critics within the broader right-wing media sphere.
The dispute comes after Trump publicly rejected a group of conservative podcasters and commentators who have historically supported him but recently voiced doubts about his administration. According to the reported remarks, Trump dismissed them as “not MAGA” and called them “losers,” saying he could win them over whenever he wanted but chose not to take their calls because he was focused on “world and country affairs.” The comments were seen as a sharp rebuke of figures who had once been considered part of his loyal media base.
Among those targeted in Trump’s criticism were Owens, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Alex Jones. Their comments had reportedly raised questions about Trump’s leadership, particularly in relation to U.S. military operations in Iran. That backlash appears to have intensified internal divisions among conservative influencers who have long aligned themselves with Trump but are now openly challenging elements of his agenda and decision-making.
Owens suggested that Loomer could also become a target of Trump’s frustration. She claimed that Trump’s advisers are “terrified” of Loomer’s “obsession,” implying that even figures close to the president may eventually fall out of favor if they become too disruptive or too closely associated with controversy. The remark adds to the perception that loyalty in Trump’s political orbit remains conditional and highly personal, with support often depending on whether a commentator is reinforcing the president’s message or questioning it.
Owens ended her criticism with an even harsher warning, telling Loomer that she needs to “step away” and address “underlying psychiatric needs.” The comment underscores the increasingly hostile tone within segments of the conservative movement, where personal attacks and public feuds have become more common as factions compete for influence around Trump.
The exchange highlights a broader rift in right-wing media between long-time Trump allies and newer, more aggressive voices seeking proximity to the former president. It also reflects Trump’s willingness to publicly punish dissent, even from supporters who previously amplified his message. As questions continue over military policy, political loyalty, and the influence of advisers, the conflict between Owens, Loomer, and Trump-aligned commentators shows no sign of easing.
